the table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitor how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods

Essay topics:

the table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitor how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods

The table gives information about the number of people who came to Ashdown Museum before it was redecorated and after counted in number. While the graphs depict comparison of the level of visitor’s satisfaction about Museum’s display year before and year after the refurbishment counted in percentage

At a glance, we can see that there was a significant growth in visitor’s number after the refurbishment process. There were five levels of satisfaction which were experienced by the visitors. Overall, a dramatic shift of visitor’s satisfaction happened after the refurbishment.

At the moment before the refurbishment, a half portion tourist felt uncomfortable, with exactly 40% dissatisfied and 10% very dissatisfied. While, only 15%, 30% felt very satisfied and satisfied, respectively, and 5% was preferred not to give responses.

Turning to the year after Museum was refurbished, in total 75% people felt comfortable for visiting it, which was 40% and 35% exactly felt satisfied and very satisfied. Then, there was a significant decline of dissatisfied visitors from 40% to 15%, and 5% remained felt very dissatisfied in a year after refurbishment.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n about the number of people who came to Ashdown Museum before it was redecorated...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61452513966 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.488485744 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6258732474 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266128294812 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114859003937 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601893105568 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160058862468 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067581088895 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.