The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two chart provides the data about the sports persons who has participated in Olympics from the year it has begun. The bar chart illustrates the number of men and women participant’s data, whereas line graph shows the total number of participants.
From the bar chart, it is clearly visible that men participants are substantially higher than that of women participants in every Olympics since it has started. However, there is sharp rise in women participants in recent year which is almost equivalent to number of men Olympic participants.
It is evident from the both charts, that men Olympic participants are grown in number gradually from about 3000 in 1924 (which is almost 95% of total participants) to almost 6000 in 2012 (50% of total participants), which is in 2012 Olympic games.
Meanwhile, women participants were almost nil in 1924 Olympics. But there was a slight increase in next two Olympics. While, between 1984 and 2012 Olympics, there is a dramatic rise in female athletes from almost 1500 (which is approximately 25% of total participants) to somewhere near 4900 number of participants (which is almost near to 50% of total participants).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich is almost 95% of total participants to almost 6000 in 2012 50% of total part...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08376963351 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02317828099 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476439790576 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.355284685 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133825448671 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743599136531 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513814823077 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101509097343 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444180404663 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.