The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportions of population and wealthy level in regions (North America, China, other Asia pacific, India, Europe, Africa, Latin America & Caribbean, and Rich Asia Pacific.
Overall, almost the percentages of population are bigger than its of global wealth. While, some areas namely North America, Europe, and rich Asia Pacific have the opposite status.
As we can see that the quantity of the rich North American reach a peak at under 35% while its of North American is about 7 times lower, around 6%. Besides, the figure for Chinese is obviously the highest number, about 24%. Furthermore, the percentages of the rich Asia pacific ’s population shows the lowest number, account for 5% which is about 3 times smaller than its of the other Asia Pacific.
It can be seen that the data of India and Africa give the same amount of the rich, at 1%. While its of Indian is higher than its of African. Moreover, there is also the same figure for China and other Asia Pacific for global wealth, around 4% which is 6 times lower than the proportions of the rich Asia Pacific.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than its of global wealth. While, some areas namely North America, Europe, and ...
^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ive the same amount of the rich, at 1%. While its of Indian is higher than its of Afr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79473684211 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36227210257 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0377635169 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953836269624 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485407643258 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477517700467 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687526916634 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189228502188 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.