the map below show the changes that have taken place in a waterfront of a town called Dảwin
The maps illustrate how the waterfront area of Darwin town changed over a 5-year period from 2009 to 2014.
Generally, It is clear that the river bank witnesses major transformation. Most noticeably, the elimination of industrial areas, the increases in tree, and the introductions of a harbour, and university building.
In 2009, the industrial area was located to the south of residential buildings, and to the west of the sea. By 2014, it had become a place that planted a significant amount of trees, while its was sited to the north of accomadations, and near the lake was built into a swimming pool. Another striking change was a establishment of a harbour on the sea, and to the south east of the school. Moreover, there was a new footpath went into the harbour directly and divided tree forest into two sides.
In 2014, a university building acrossed the school from the walking road, and next to the resident area had constructed. Because of the enlarging facilities, the river side attracted a larger population as the residential buildings had established two times greater than its in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mming pool. Another striking change was a establishment of a harbour on the sea, ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95698924731 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9933830754 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8059568162 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0738955313447 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308843748914 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604146959938 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572207293636 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804326400302 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.