The chart below shows the type of transport young people in four countries prefer to use

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the type of transport young people in four countries prefer to use.

The bar chart illustrates the proportions of preferable means of transport that the youngsters in four countries (Great Britain, USA, Germany, France) choose for their daily movement.
Overall, the young prefer to use car than any transportation. Additionally, the use of friendly transportations with environment to reduce environmental problems is not popular with them, except in Germany.
It can be seen that the percentages of young people move by car reach a peak in France, at about 74%. While its of Germany teenagers are smaller, at 40%-the lowest number for car using. For more details, there is a similar quantity in Great Britain and USA for car, in 60%. Furthermore, its in Great Britain and France is also showed clearly for motorcycle, at 10% which is the lowest point in the graph. While the figure for motorcycle in USA is three times greater than its of Great Britain and France.
Because the proportions of using transportations that need fuel are significantly high, air pollution and traffic congestion are worse in daily life. But in Germany, the percentages of using bicycle are the first priority, account for about 45%. While its in USA is 4.5 times smaller than Germany, account for 10%. Although the rates of unfriendly vehicles with environment is considerable in Great Britain and France, the data of using bicycle is in second level that higher than its of motorcycle. It is showed by a difference between the figure for Great Britain in motorcycle and bicycle is about 3 times and its for France is around 1.6 times

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (France) must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...ies Great Britain, USA, Germany, France choose for their daily movement. Overall, th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '40%-the the lowest'.
Suggestion: 40%-the the lowest
...ts of Germany teenagers are smaller, at 40%-the lowest number for car using. For more details,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98455598456 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88347978285 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.281114001 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3076923077 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160884198659 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629638465735 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663186187967 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126558006321 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674896400645 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.