Bar chart The bar chart shows the number of hours worked by men women per week in Australia in 2007

Essay topics:

Bar chart (The bar chart shows the number of hours worked by men & women per week in Australia in 2007).

The bar chart illustrates the proportions of hours that Australian adults spent in their work weekly in 2007.
Overall, it was obvious that people in 30-50 ages were hard working than any other age. Additionally, the youngest and oldest were less work because their health were not allow.
It could be seen that the percentages in 30-50 and 60-80 ages of men were significantly higher than its of women, it was showed by 1.7 times bigger in 60-80 age. For more details, the number of working hours of men was as same as women in over 80 ages, at 10%. Besides, the quantity of men reached a peak about 43% in 30-50 ages while its of women is slightly smaller, in 35%.
In contrast, workers in 0-10 and 10-20 ages were almost female gender. Additionally, the figure for the girl in 0-10 ages, accounted for 15%, was 3 times greater than its of the boy. Moreover, the proportions in 10-20 ages of women was about 22%, was bigger than its of me, at 12%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'allowed'.
Suggestion: allowed
...less work because their health were not allow. It could be seen that the percentages...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48850574713 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36220879414 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.003600553 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.7777777778 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187347899197 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886193211518 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117653814926 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148264583061 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147016091523 0.0819641961636 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.