The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The bar chart depicts that percentage of users who use the number of social networking sites in Canada in 2014 & 2015
Overall, one site had highest user in 2014 & 2015 while, lowest number of users used five sites during 2 years. Number of users who did not use any site was almost same through the period .
As the graph shows, there was slight decrease in the categories of no sites. From 22% in 2014 to 21% in 2015. Afterwards, 36% people used one site in 2015. But the trend for this categories experienced a declined by 8% in 2015 that was the most popular among dwellers. The number of users for two sites categories remained similar, around at 23% in 2014 and 24% in 2015.
Furthermore, before witnessing a rise, the proportion for three sites users accounted for about 12% in 2014. Meantime, in terms of four sites, it had only 5% user in 2014 while it increased slightly to 8% in 2015. Lastly, only 2% used five sites in 2014 and growth of number in 2015 with 2% in 2015. Hence, this categories had Lowest user over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etworking sites in Canada in 2014 & 2015 Overall, one site had highest user in 20...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...da in 2014 & 2015 Overall, one site had highest user in 2014 & 2015 while, lowest numbe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...te had highest user in 2014 & 2015 while, lowest number of users used five sites during ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... site was almost same through the period . As the graph shows, there was slight...
^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sed one site in 2015. But the trend for this categories experienced a declined by 8%...
^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms of four sites, it had only 5% user in 2014 while it increased slightly to 8% i...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... number in 2015 with 2% in 2015. Hence, this categories had Lowest user over the per...
^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the Lowest'.
Suggestion: had the Lowest
...with 2% in 2015. Hence, this categories had Lowest user over the period.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, lastly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50526315789 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31978581172 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8730391829 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8181818182 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379338694879 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149285238115 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121591187291 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284821562401 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110853609431 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.