The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates how many social networking sites from zero to five sites citizens in Canada used during one-year timeframe from 2014 to 2015.
Overall, it is obvious that one site registered the highest number of users among six groups of social networks, whilst five sites made up the lowest number of people throughout the period.
Looking at the diagram, one site accounted for the highest number of social networking users in the year 2014 at slightly over 36 percent in comparison with the lowest point in the group of five sites at 2 percent. Additionally, there was a slight difference in the proportion of no sites and one sites during this period, at about 22 and 23 respectively. The figure for social networking users in three sites was significantly higher than that in four site by 7 percent.
In details, in 2015 one site still witnessed the highest position in term of number of users but this proportion was lower than that in 2014 by 8 percent. Likewise, no sites in 2015 was slightly lower than that in 2014 by 1 percent while there was an increase in the percentage of two sides users from 23 in 2014 to 24 in 2015. This figure for three sites twice as much as four sites users. Five sites still took up the lowest percentage of social networking users in 2015 at 4.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'site' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sites'.
Suggestion: sites
... significantly higher than that in four site by 7 percent. In details, in 2015 one...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62931034483 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52282976748 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465517241379 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5699164356 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225485210325 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117937137396 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407865439633 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164086360324 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304409657283 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.