The chart below gives information about southland's main exports in current year 2018 and future projections of 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where
The supplied histogram delineates the information about, main exports in 2000, 2018 and future projections of 2025 in southland. The data is calibrated in billions, which is clearly and coherently represented.
To comments with, It is seen that, in a 2000 maximum exports were of international tourism with quantity of 8 billion and minimum exporting was of meat products which was two billion less than International tourism. Further more, in the current year 2018, dairy products are highly exported with 19.9 billion, while meat products are less exported with quantity of 5.5 billion approximately in Southland.
Probing ahead, It is noticed that, in the future projection of 2025 exporting of international tourism and dairy products will be with ten billion and 9.5 billion respectively and meat products will be 4 billion less than international tourism in southland.
Overall, it is evident that, meat products are the products which are exported in least quantity as compared to other products as they are not exported more than quantity of 6 billion during all the given years in southland's main exportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the least'.
Suggestion: in the least
...cts are the products which are exported in least quantity as compared to other products ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33707865169 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95951728885 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505617977528 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7375485654 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.333333333 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179244042175 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125624373172 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137634908808 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144730227045 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967416834009 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.