The chart below gives information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.
The given pie chart depicts information regarding the ages of habitants of Yeman and Italy in 2000 and also projected their ages for the year 2050.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the population of youngsters in Italy and Yemen would be increased by 2050. On the contrary, it is predicted that the first age bracket would plummet by 2050.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that in the former year, around half of the population was aged 0_14 but this is predicted to decline by 13per cent in the year 2050. However, the population of above 60 would grow by 20 per cent in 2050 than the year 2000. Yemen population tended to rise by 57.3 per cent in 2050.
Shifting to the remaining data, Italy had a more population of juvenile about 61.6 per cent in the former year as compared to only 46.3 per cent is predicted by 2050. There would be a cast difference between the population of grey people about 24.1 per cent in 2000 to 42.3 per cent in the year 2050. The population of children would be decreased by 3 per cent by 2050.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...former year as compared to only 463 per cent is predicted by 2050 There would be a c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37755102041 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45615445576 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479591836735 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 196.0 22.4926829268 871% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 858.0 112.824112599 760% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 196.0 22.9334400587 855% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 67.0 5.23603664747 1280% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326267441286 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.326267441286 0.103423049105 315% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239036715767 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109153669256 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 97.2 13.2329268293 735% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -102.08 61.2550243902 -167% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 76.2 10.3012195122 740% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.31 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.1 8.06136585366 200% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.4 10.9970731707 731% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.