The chart gives the information on the ages of the population of yemen and italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.
The circular chart reveals the information that representation on the ages of the population of yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Moving a quick glance on the illustration in 2000 the rose population was 0-14 toddler years. Afterthat, this is higher ratio in the chart of yemen. Hence, in 15-59 years was nearly reduced population in the yemen and 60 years was plumment in the chart .it is very declined ratio. Then, teenager will be increase in the population in 2050. Moreover, 15 -59 years and 60 year will be same ratio in 2000 to 2050 .
On the flip side, in 15-59 years was rose population ratio 61 percent in 2000 and italy and in 2050 will be fall down population in 15 -59 years. Last, 60 years group are all same ratio in 2000 to 2050.
To sum up, 0-14 pupil are boomed to population yemen in 2000 to 2050. All far all, in italy are high population in 15-59 percent in 2000 to 2050.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n and 60 years was plumment in the chart .it is very declined ratio. Then, teenage...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... year will be same ratio in 2000 to 2050 . On the flip side, in 15-59 years was...
^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars was rose population ratio 61 percent in 2000 and italy and in 2050 will be fa...
^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To sum up, 0-14 pupil are boomed to population yemen in 2000 to 2050. All f...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up, 0-14 pupil are boomed to population yemen in 2000 to 2050. All far all, in i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, moreover, then, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43195266272 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43006685371 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449704142012 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0342689377 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41426096778 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203645495929 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180157197523 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354329452 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217896312735 0.0819641961636 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.