The chart below given information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.
The pie charts represent about the percentage of the population of Yemen and Italy on the basis of different age groups during 2000 and for the projection of 2050 year.
To begin with, in 2000, the proportion of 15-59 year age group in both the countries was more as about 46.3% and 61.6%. However, in Yemen, the percentage of 60+ years people was too lower only up to 3.6% while in Italy, the proportion of this type of age group as about 24.1%. 0-14 years age group masses had half of percentage from total in Yemen. In contrast, in Italy, the proportion of this age group was approximately near to half of 30%.
On the other hand, during the projection for 2050, Yemen will have more than 50% population in the age group between 15-59 years while in Italy, their percentage will have less than half of total. In addition, in Yemen, the people who are including in 0-14 year age group, they will have higher proportion(37%) as compared to Italy's population(11.5%). Apart from that, there will become huge difference in the proportion of the population of Yemen and Italy in 60+years age group individuals as about 5.7% and 42.3%.
Overall, during 2000 and projection for 2050, both Yemen and Italy has higher proportion of population in particular age group which is 15 to 59 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ge group in both the countries was more as about 46.3% and 61.6%. However, in Yeme...
^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to lower'?
Suggestion: to lower
... the percentage of 60+ years people was too lower only up to 3.6% while in Italy, the pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, apart from, as to, in addition, in contrast, in particular, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6814159292 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57032042872 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46017699115 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9413950287 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 5.23603664747 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318145273571 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174049775386 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133098655851 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288579328464 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130935052008 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.