The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The table gives information about the count of tourists who were visited to Ashdown Museum during the year after and before of its renovation. The pie charts illustrate about the satisfaction of visitors during same couple of periods.
To begin with, the count of visitors who were visit before renovation is 74000, from which 40% of individuals were dissatisfied. Moreover, the proportion of satisfied masses was about 30%, out of total. Apart from that, the count of proportion of those visitors who were extremely satisfied and not satisfied was similar with the difference of 5%. Whereas, only 5% of tourists were those who gave no response.
On contrast, nearly one lakh visitors were gone after renovation of that public place. From total, 40% count of masses was satisfied. Additionally, about 35% of visitors shown extreme satisfaction with their visit. However, only 15% masses were dissatisfied with it. Apart from that, the proportion of extreme discontented and no responded masses was same (5%) respectively.
Overall, the count of visitors who toured before renovation was less than those who visited after that. Whereas, before recondition, the proportion of disconnected was more, however after that, satisfied masses became higher in proportion by visiting Ashdown Museum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'visited'.
Suggestion: visited
...in with, the count of visitors who were visit before renovation is 74000, from which ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... was similar with the difference of 5%. Whereas, only 5% of tourists were those who gav...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, whereas, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39108910891 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81669247424 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6755597311 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7692307692 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5384615385 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299489876649 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117713769296 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685281867868 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211349681416 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664012708738 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.