The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 respectively.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
As it can be seen, the proportion of young adults aged between 18 and 25 years old donated the least in both years, whereas adults from 36 years old onwards donated the most amount of money.
The proportion of 18 to 25-year-olds donated approximately 15% and it fell by 10% in 2010, the greatest across all other age groups. Both 26 to 35-year-olds and 36 to 50-year olds followed fairly similar trends, as both percentages dipped by just above 5% as compared to 1990. in 2010, just under a quarter of 26 to 35-year-olds donated to charity, whereas around two-fifths of 36 to 50-year-olds donated. Surprisingly, the proportion of 35 to 50-year-olds that did a charitable donation was the highest at 42% in 1990.
On the other hand, adults from 51 years of age followed an opposite trend. The percentage of 51 to 65-year-olds grew by approximately 5%, from 35% to just below 40%, the highest in 2010. For those above 65 years old, the proportion grew marginally as percentage only rose to 35% in 2010, from 32.5% in 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...d by just above 5% as compared to 1990. in 2010, just under a quarter of 26 to 35-...
^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...ear-olds that did a charitable donation was the highest at 42% in 1990. On the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72777777778 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89283384492 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7365316033 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130664668979 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772482639585 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240949531008 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100661284694 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303308462077 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.