The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The chart below illustrates how British people of all ages, with a percent of what they donate. These data cover the years 1990 and 2010.
General speaking, people between the agez of 36 and 50 donated the most between 1990 and 2010 (the percentages are about 35 and 40). The lowest percent is observed in people between the ages of 18 and 25 (about 5 to 15 percent).
Donations the people between the ages ofch18 and 25 have dropped by 10 percent over the year. On the contrary, the people 51 and 65 are 5 percent more likely to donate. This increase is also observed in people over 65 years of age. We can also see a decline in the percentage of charities in the other age groups.
The difference from 1990 to 2010, in 1990, people did charity more than in 2010,and of course, it depends on the age of the people.
In summary, in 1990 and 2010 the British people by various ages to help other people have gone down rapidly.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...charity more than in 2010,and of course, it depends on the age of the people. I...
^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the age of the people. In summary, in 1990 and 2010 the British people by v...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in summary, of course, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35260115607 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22279702695 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9814751265 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240467458529 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106534175171 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423833397658 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150714603814 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299429495663 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.65 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.