The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 (%).
The horizontal bar graph reveals what percentum of living issues of city residents in major UK cities in the year 2008.
A quick look at bar chart is quite enough to make it clear that the maximum dwellers of United Kingdom were fighted with health services and education related matters. However, air pollution was marginal in UK.
In the analisation of health sevices in seven various UK metropolitons, Belfast and Cardiff both were stood at top postion with almost three fifths. Birmingham and ondon had gain next two ranks through the negligible difference of percentage (5%) from the top cities in similar case. Analogous proportion was seen in Newcastle and Manchester that was exactly just over a half.
In comparison, with health services, the pattern of education and training and air pollution were unique, for education and training, same spectacular rate was followed by five areas namely Glasgow, London, Besfast, Birmingham and Cardiff that was nearly half of the entire education and training rate. In contrary, Newcastle and Manchester were under fifty percent. In the trend of air pollution, Newcastle, Belfast, Birmingham, Cardiff and Manchester were witnessed of increasing order (from 5% to 18%). At the same time, air pollution in Glasgow and London were contributing less than one in twenty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd Manchester were under fifty percent. In the trend of air pollution, Newcastle, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23696682464 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73214425049 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620853080569 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0221287523 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930113113312 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421347213951 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751859736875 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895261259813 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100118586436 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.