The chart below shows the proportion of males and females in Malaysia who commonly do physical activity in 2010.
The bar graph reveals what percentum of Malaysian men and women who exercise regularly in the year 2010.
A quick look at column chart is quite enough to make it clear that the younger masculine under age 24 were much fascinating towards physical activities. However, feminine were less interested in these exercises in the similar age group.
In the analisation of males, participation in labourious tasks was following downward pattern with the increment of life expectancy upto 44 that was went down at two fifths from nearly half. In contrary, age group 45-54, 55-64 and above 64 were doing more regular exercises and reached just over two fifths in last age group.
In comparison, with males, in case of females, women physical activity endulgement was soaring with longitivity especially for three age groups 15-24, 35-44 and hitted the maximum peak with half of total pecentum. This proportion was analogous for next two age groups 45-54 and 55-64. omen who were over 65 least contributing in daily exercises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t over two fifths in last age group. In comparison, with males, in case of fema...
^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Omen
...or next two age groups 45-54 and 55-64. omen who were over 65 least contributing in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14371257485 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64137702763 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694610778443 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7132573458 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901604416562 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397787704669 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279187850301 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577067420338 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256253096081 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.