The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008-2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money which was given for aid from the US, Germany, the UK, Japan, Netherland, and Sweden to developing countries between 2008 and 2010. Units are measured in billions of dollars.
In 2008, the US and Germany spent about 22 billion dollars and 10 billion dollars respectively. The amount which was accounted for the UK and Japan were around 12 billion dollars each, and for Netherland and Sweden, it was around 8 billion dollars for each.
In 2009, the US reduced its amount for aid, which was 2 billion dollars. Similarly, the UK and Japan also decreased their budget, and this amount stood at roughly 11 billion and 10 billion dollars respectively. On the other hand, Germany, Netherland and Sweden increased their spending amount to approximately 13 billion, 8 billion and 7 billion dollars.
In 2009, while all the countries rose their budget, Sweden declined their annual amount for aid to developing countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-18 | HARPREET KAUR MAAN | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | Efuli | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-13 | AshishSilli | view |
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society 81
- The given graph shows the past and the projected figures of the government spending as a percentage of GDP for the years 2000 to 2025 in three areas 78
- The bar chart shows the information about the favorite subjects of 60 students from two schools school A and school B 83
- Some say that people living in high-rise apartments are lonely and unhappy, while others say that it’s advantageous to stay in high-rise apartments. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The table below describes the number of people in million who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07547169811 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64693961174 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7543857399 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941323279404 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543675233429 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859390671834 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948861462879 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920555170274 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.