The graph below shows four categories of citrus fruits and the top three countries to which these were exported in 2012

Essay topics:

The graph below shows four categories of citrus fruits and the top three countries to which these were exported in 2012.

The bar charts illustrate the amount of four types of citrus fruits (oranges, lemons, grapefruits, and others) which were exported in different countries in 2012. Units are measured in thousand tonnes.

Overall, it is apparent that Mexico was the highest exporter of lemons and other citrus fruits. On the other hand, South Africa and Turkey exported the highest amount of oranges and grapefruits respectively, in compared to other countries in the given time period. One noticeable point is that the United States was the only country who exported all four categories of citrus fruits.

Mexico exported the highest amount of lemons, more precisely 500 thousand tonnes, in compared to the United States and Argentina who exported 200 and 100 thousand tonnes respectively. Mexico also exported grapefruits and other citrus fruits except oranges. The amount of other citrus fruits which was exported by Mexico far higher than the other countries. This amount was equal to the amount of exported lemon fruits.

South Africa and Turkey exported 1000 and 400 thousand tonnes of oranges and grapefruits respectively. The amount of oranges Egypt exported were half than the amount of South Africa, but 100 thousand tonnes higher than the United States. While Mexico exported 300 thousand tonnes of grapefruits, the United States exported 100 thousand tonnes less than it.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (45 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ountries in 2012. Units are measured in thousand tonnes. Overall, it is apparent that...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35185185185 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50281049156 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430555555556 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1017286528 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215081369592 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103862537216 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865239567819 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170857517236 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770109958423 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.