The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in
Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
There are two different chart and graphs on the picture displayed the expenditure on fast foods by three income groups and consumption rate of fast foods during 1970-1990 in Britain.
According to the bar chart, first of all, it could be seen that there are tree groups base on their income: high income, average income and low income.
High income group spend 42 pence per person per week on hamburgers which is the maximum of consumption rate between three groups. Also it should be noted that eating fish, chips and pizza are similar in this group by consumption rate of 19 pence per week per person.
Average income group spent more money on eating hamburgers as same as previous group, almost 32 pence per week per person. Plus, 25 pence per person per week was spent on buying fish and chips which is more than of money were spent on pizza by consumption rate of 12 pence per person per week.
Apart from that, in low income group, each person spent 18 pence weekly on buying fish and chips. Added, they spent 14 pence per person on hamburgers and less than 10 pence per person on pizza every week.
I believe , there is a correlation between amount of income and money was spent on fast foods by individuals.
Based on the graph, there is a sudden increase in consumption of hamburgers during 1970-1990 from 100 to 500 grames.
It is immediately apparent from the graph that fish and foods unlike other junk foods has gradual decrease in consumption from 310 grames to nearly 230 grames during those years.
As the graph depict, pizza line has gradual increase during those years from 40 grames to 280 grames.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... consumption rate between three groups. Also it should be noted that eating fish, ch...
^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... spent 14 pence per person on hamburgers and less than 10 pence per person on piz...
^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r person on pizza every week. I believe , there is a correlation between amount o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, apart from, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68531468531 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25121624952 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468531468531 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.048331373 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204691826143 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947243059015 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585243392982 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101364771466 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065422236049 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.