The chart below shows the average percentages in typical meals for three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The pie charts compare how much three particular types nutritional components, which may all do harm to human if over consumed, the american have in distinctive meals on average.
Overall, sodium and saturated fat are mostly eaten in dinner whereas it is snack when the highest percentage of added sugar consumed. Moreover, it can be seen that breakfast includes the tiniest proportion of three mentioned nutrients.
Looking at the charts in more detail, dinner consists of the largest figure for sodium with 43% which is 6% higher than that of saturated fat. Furthermore, American have over a quarter of these nutrients for their lunch with the exception of added sugar that just registers a small portion.
Standing at the lowest point of 14%, the percentage of sodium consisted in breakfast and snack shows a similarity while this figure for saturated fat stands at 16% and 21% respectively. Besides, the most noticeable feature is that added sugar is mainly eaten in snack and in particular, its portion accounts for exactly 42%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 221, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...rter of these nutrients for their lunch with the exception of added sugar that just registers a small...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Standing
...hat just registers a small portion. standing at the lowest point of 14%, the percent...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14705882353 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69889763476 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641176470588 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2390890832 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231022727429 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959040257193 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637316685296 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134996547312 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627426514515 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.