Children nowadays watch significantly more television than those in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this the case?
What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children?
It goes without saying that, on a daily basis, children tend to devote more time to watching tv compared to the past from which their lower activity levels derive. In this essay, I will offer some compelling reasons leading to this case and suggest solutions to the question of how to increase the activity rates of children.
There is no exaggeration to say that this situation is resulted from a myriad of factors. Despite general understanding of technology as being standardizing people's life, it is a mixed blessing. In other words, developed technology obviously give children more channels with a wealth of films as well as programmes than in the past. This leads to the fact that children are likely to never feel bored as they can watch anything interesting they want. Not only does the diversity of channels cause excessive watching tv today but a lack of parents' control is also a key reason. Parents are now so busy that they seem to pay less attention to their children such as letting them stay at home alone. Sometimes, it is due to the misunderstanding about taking advantage of tv. In detail, some people claim that the more they watch tv, the better knowledge they gain. As a result, children abuse tv and not enrol in outdoor activities.
For such reasons, it is high time parents borne a duty to restrict the several hours children spend on watching tv to a reasonable figure, particularly 2 hours. Moreover, they had better recommend children to play more sports and let them take part in outdoor activities like doing charity, going camping. Children also should be raised awareness of how harmful if they overuse tv so that they can balance their time appropriately. Furthermore, it is school's responsibility to organize more extracurricular activities for students to participate, which will probably cut back on the figure for hours they watch tv effectively.
In conclusion, it is not absurd to argue that, opposed to the past, children have a tendency to watch more tv so it is about time for the adult to bear their responsibility as I have mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it goes without saying that on a daily bas...
^^
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'child'?
Suggestion: child
...es without saying that on a daily basic children tend to devote more time to watching tv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as well 'as'".
Suggestion: as
... wealth of films and programmes as well than in the past. this leads to the fact tha...
^^^^
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nd programmes as well than in the past. this leads to the fact that children are lik...
^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
...ties like doing charity, going camping. children also should be raised awareness of how ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86797752809 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85566141346 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2756756145 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256438034223 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834827685844 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656884772948 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179594353591 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838887283992 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.