The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001, and the pie chart gives information about the library’s membership in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compared how many books from each category that Lammertown public library lended the library in the year of 1991 and 2001. Concurrently, the pie chart illustrates the membership status of the library in 2010.
Overall, the figure for books borrowed from Lammertown public library in 2001 in total was much higher than that in 1991. Specifically, the year 2001 experienced a pronounced increase in the number of romance books borrowed and it is clear that this genre remained the highest over a ten-year period while the opposite was true for language ones. In addition, in 2010, there were more women being members of the library as against the men.
In terms of the bar chart, in 1991, there were 1000 romance books borrowed from the Town library and this highest figure increased significantly by 400 to continually keep the first place. Besides, the year 2001 witnessed a dramatic growth to nearly 1000. While the figure for autobiographies the library remained unchanged at nearly 400, the number of children's fiction showed a noticeable reduction.
According to the pie chart, in 2010, standing at 68%, the percentage of female members was almost twice as much as that of male ones.
Comments
The given bar chart…
The given bar chart indicates how many books the Lammertown Public Library lent to readers over a decade from 1991 to 2001 whilst the pie graph illustrates the proportion of the Library’s membership based on gender in 2010.
Overall, the number of books borrowed in this course of time experienced remarkable differences amongst various genres of books. Meanwhile, many more men registered for their membership of the Library compared to women.
It is evident from the bar chart that Self-improvement, Romance, and Thriller were the types of books whose customers grew significantly throughout this period. Most noticeably, Romance books held the highest position from 1991 to 2001 with 1000 and 1400 books, respectively. In addition, self-improvement books saw a drastically 5-fold increase in figure, at around 1000 books. Meanwhile, Thriller books rose subtly, by 200 books from over 600 books in 2001. This was the same for Language books, which not only slightly increased by roughly 100 books but the least preferred one, compared to the rest types of books. On the other hand, the number of male members in 2010 demonstrated in the pie chart, accounted for over 68% whilst figure for female members was nearly a third.
However, Crime novels, Children’s fiction and Autobiographies witnessed a significant dwindle in their figures. Both Crime novels and Children’s fiction declined twice in the number of borrowed books, with about 250 and 370 books in 2001 respectively. Exceptionally, Autobiographies remained static during this time, constituted under 400 books.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99502487562 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63987431755 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.224705817 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333424796066 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15030239039 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942696622662 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213492914029 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113064724681 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.