The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001.
The graph portraits how car ownership had been changing in Great Britain in the period 1961-2001.
We are given 3 types of households: without a car, with one car, with two or more cars. For those households who had no car it was downward trend. Vice versa, households with 1 and 2 or more cars showed an upward trend.
Let’s go into details. Early on, in 1961, people without a car had the highest rate - about 66%. 1-car axis and 2-or-more car axis had 35% and 0% respectively. Till 1981 those 2 groups showed almost the same rise, only with 1 exception for axis for 2-or-more cars in between 1971-1981 - there was a slowdown in growth. After 1981 the volume of households with 1 car started to slightly decline, while the rising of the households with 2 or more cars started to go up more quickly.
At the end of given data, 2001, the percentage of households who had no car and who had 2 or more cars levelled off - it was approximately 29%, while the amount of households with 1 car was about 45%.
In summary, we see that from 1961 till 2001 the amount of households with at least 1 car had increased, and the percentage who had no cas had declined.
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 60
- Some think that the investment should be made in the development of new transportation infrastructure between towns Others claim that the investment should be made in the improvement of current transportation systems in the cities 61
- The table gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- Many children are encouraged by their parents to get a part time job in their free time What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message State your opinion 67
- The reading states there are several benefits to the consumption of organic foods which eventually may have a significant impact on human health However the lecturer suggests that foods grown organically are not as healthy as they seem to be 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, at least, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45327102804 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53369905705 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518691588785 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3909335416 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6363636364 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23636030131 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110398066748 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101932903632 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174572593826 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122423227293 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.