The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held the in 1999.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held the in 1999.

The bar chart which was given compares the proportion of five difference degree which was held by both sexes in Australia in 1999. Overall, it can be seen that undergraduate diploma and bachelor degree were among the top list of females holding-degree, meanwhile, diploma, postgraduate diploma, and master degree were shared the highest proportion of holding-degree by males.

On male participants, the highest post-school qualification which was obtained was skilled vocational diploma, which is 90%. Followed by postgraduate diploma and master’s degree, 70% and 60% each. While bachelor’s degree and undergraduate diploma were among the lowest proportion on men qualifications, 45% and 35% respectively.

Moving to females, undergraduate diploma was the largest share of qualification which was hold (70%). Furthermore, bachelor’s and master’s degrees were accounted for second and third number with 54% and 40% respectively. The remaining degrees (postgraduate and skilled vocational diplomas) were below one-third of the proportion.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re of qualification which was hold 70%. Furthermore, bachelor's and master&...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07333333333 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58979417547 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8026107712 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122796638911 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593007803248 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639488759524 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088081981277 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362396315224 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 11.4140731707 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.