The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides information about the proportion of frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the years 2003-2013.
Overall, it is clear that the most of people ate unhealthy meals once a week or once or twice a month during the given period, while junk food was eaten every day or never by the tiny minority of folks.
It can be seen from the graph that the biggest proportion of frequency, more than a quarter, that people chose to eat unhealthy food once a week or once or twice a month between 2003 and 2013. In contrast, the number of frequency of folks eaten junk food every day or never amounted to less than 5 percentage in 2003 and it was followed by 1% decrease in 2006 and the proportion stood at the same percentage during the next 7 years. However, the number of inhabitants, who eat junk food a few times a year, increased to 15% in the year 2006 and remained the same over the next 7 years. Also, the proportion of frequency of eating fast food among people who were eaten fast food at least a few time a week made up nearly a fifth in the years 2003-2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...-2013. Overall, it is clear that the most of people ate unhealthy meals once a week or once...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...ple who were eaten fast food at least a few time a week made up nearly a fifth in the ye...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35922330097 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41240158402 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485436893204 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.4198876253 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.666666667 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199692079558 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119369656901 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885478945138 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164964336253 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091525846447 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.6 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.