The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants over a decade between 2003 and 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates information about how often U.S. citizens attended in junk food restaurants from 2003 and 2013.
Overall, it is clear an attendance increase in junk food restaurants were experienced only in consumer who ate it two or less per month and a few times a year, while the number of others decreased during the whole period. An interesting point is the most preferable frequencies were two or less per month and several times annually.
To begin with, in 2003 the proportion of junk food consumers who attended once a week was over 30% and despite increasing by 2% in three-year period, the figure declined to about 28 in 2013. People who went once or twice a month to eat fast food was 30%. Having dropped to 25%, the percentage of attenders grew by almost 8% in the final year. In contrast, people who preferred eat junk food every day and never almost remained stable at 3-5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 746.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72151898734 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59447356163 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0140528154 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140649535964 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705155751717 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607176056656 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112805420208 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609753694436 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.