The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The data provides information regarding the amount of budget used by UAE in 2000 on distinct categories.
In general, the government's highest spending was on social security, which sum up to more than 30 percent of the total budget. Health and personal services slightly more than half of total spending on social security, in the second place, and the third-largest spending was allocated for education.
The government’s concern for social areas reflected inside the budget: social security, health and personal social services, and education consumed 100 billion, 53 billion, and 38 billion respectively. The total of these 3 areas made up more than 50% of total budget spent. Besides, the government spent on average 22 billion for defence, debt interest, and other expenditures. The rest of the budgets were below 20 billion were spent on law and order, industry, agriculture, and employment, housing heritage and environment, and transport and made up total 64 billion.
In conclusion, the government's main focus was higher on social areas that cover social security, health sector, and education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'governments the highest'.
Suggestion: governments the highest
...distinct categories. In general, the governments highest spending was on social security, which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...lion. In conclusion, the governments main focus was higher on social areas that cover s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, regarding, second, so, third, in conclusion, in general, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45664739884 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91555330384 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6904952478 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122263974558 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648798800609 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039157415013 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880726719046 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415172328491 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.