Government spend a lot amount of money on arts such as paintings and sculptures on public area. Do you think it is a good or bad use of money? why?
There is a statement said that the government spend a huge amount of money on arts, especially on paintings and sculptures on public area. In my opinion, it should be a wise idea in widening cultural awareness for public. This essay will discuss both positive and negative budget allocation in arts.
To begin with, giving up a lot of budget in developing cultural aspects, especially paintings and sculptures will increase awareness amongst society. Socializing paintings and sculptures to public will rise up awareness of people, particularly in traditional arts. For example, painting galleries those are open on public are able to cut the boundary between artists and ordinary people. Secondly, paintings and sculptures reflect originality and genuine meaning of traditional arts. Unfortunately, many people are moving to use more of digital arts rather than traditional paintings. In my country, for example, traditional paintings Museums are less popular than digital arts and museum.
On the other hand, spending too much money on artistic or cultural area is not essential. Government have to list and decide their major to minor priorities. Major priorities such as poverty, safety, health, and education must be on top of priorities. For example, people will be careless to art if they are starving. People have to fulfill their needs, then wants. In addition, before putting sculptures and paintings on public area, it is better to increase the pride in every people. Without pride, they will not count it as something important.
In my opinion, it is a great idea to place traditional arts on public places. However, government must allocate their budget from the highest to lowest priority. They should be more focus on essential rather than additional things.
In conclusion, displaying paintings and sculptures on public area will increase people’s awareness on culture and arts despite the fact that government must fulfill major needs, which is more important rather than social aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...tural area is not essential. Government have to list and decide their major to minor...
^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the lowest'.
Suggestion: to the lowest
... allocate their budget from the highest to lowest priority. They should be more focus on ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38924050633 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82101572253 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7231355761 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.15 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26233635439 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785892352609 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851193146219 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151154717726 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507857723123 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.