The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989
The bar chart illustrates percentage change in average house prices in five cities in 1990-2002 compare with 1989. Overall, it is evident that average house prices significantly changed in New York, Tokyo and London.
From 1990 to 1995 house prices in New York decreased by 5 percent, while the figure for Tokyo and London was higher than New York, felling by approximately 7 percent compared with 1989. By contrast, the average house prices in Madrid and Frankfurt slightly increased, by around 2 percent and 3 percent respectively.
Between 1996 and 2002, the house prices considerably increased compared to that from 1990 to 1995. The house cost in New York in this period was 5 percent, which is higher than in 1989, while the figure for Madrid also increased by 4 percent, being lower than New York. In London, the house prices significantly increased from declining by 7 percent in the first period to rising by 11 percent in the next 5 years compared with 1989. The house prices in Japan was continuously lower than in 1989 by 5 percent, while the figure for Frankfurt remained stable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...changed in New York, Tokyo and London. From 1990 to 1995 house prices in New Yo...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2 percent and 3 percent respectively. Between 1996 and 2002, the house prices ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93010752688 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64944687365 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462365591398 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9311230802 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38669434381 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240646557512 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15937418228 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347432678738 0.15604864568 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164664759962 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.