The chart below shows the male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000. Summarise the information by reporting main feature and make comparison where possible.
The bar graph below provides data about number of men and women fitness membership from 1970 to 2000.
As an overall trend in first fifteen years male membership was higher than female, whereas this number increased for women in next fifteen till 2000 with exception in 1995 when men number peaked.
In 1970 number of males was double than female as 1000 and 2000 number ratio. While in coming five years this number double for men with comparison women, when women were 2000 in digits and men were 40000. In 1985 this number slightly decreased for females about 1800 in figures but males numbers greatly shrinked to approximately 2500.
However, in 1990 reverse trend observed, female figures climbed to 2900 while men fall to1900. And in 1990 both genders digits were same 2100. In 1995 a huge rise in males membership observed 5000 whereas female number were 2800. In 2000 both sexes number plunged 2000 for females and its half 1000 for men, which was lowest number for males with compare to last century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-06 | Farwa Nasir | 61 | view |
- The line graph below gives the information about the number of visitor to three London museums between Jun and September 2013 Summarize the information by reporting and selecting main features and make comparison where possible 73
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information and make comparison where possible 61
- Stores should sell local food products and not the imported food products To what extend do you agree or not 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of animal and plants Others say there are more important environmental problems Discuss both the views and your own opinion 89
- The diagram below illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summaries the information by reporting main feature and make comparison where possible 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th genders digits were same 2100 In 1995 a huge rise in males membership observed...
^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...females and its half 1000 for men which was lowest number for males with compare to last c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74137931034 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.005812995 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 174.0 22.4926829268 774% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 825.0 112.824112599 731% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 174.0 22.9334400587 759% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 43.0 5.23603664747 821% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158959052687 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158959052687 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123805117219 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357179430005 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 87.9 13.2329268293 664% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -79.75 61.2550243902 -130% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 67.6 10.3012195122 656% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.4 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.26 8.06136585366 189% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 71.6 10.9970731707 651% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 88.0 11.0658536585 795% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.