The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates how many men and women in Britain enrolled in tertiary education in 3 periods and whether their studies were part-time or full-time.
Overall, there were more people studying full-time than part-time in all periods. However, while the number of female students increased remarkably over the periods shown, that of male students decreased moderately.
As for part-time education, the number of men doubled over the 20-year period, rising from 100 thousand in 1970/71 to 200 thousand in 1990/91. The figure for women choosing this path was also about 200 thousand, which was substantially higher than the number of 40 thousand in 1970/71.
With regard to full-time courses, there was a significant growth of 400 thousand in the number of women to 1.1 million, which was the highest quantity in any period for any kind of studying. In contrast, the number of men pursuing full-time studies dropped from 1 million to roughly 800 thousand between 1970/71 and 1980/81, though it then grew slightly to 900 thousand in the next 10 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while, as for, in contrast, kind of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17919075145 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6263774033 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6009925147 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222195417403 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119759323167 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924228937684 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165576130793 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962399681206 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.