The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.

The given bar chart illustrates the information about the students used five types (car passenger, walking, cycling, walking and bus, bus) of transportation modes for trips of one country in 1990 and 2010.

Overall, the walking was preferred by majority of students for trip in 1990 while most of the students chose car for their travel in 2010.

Regarding the bar chart, the highest number of students walked for their trip which accounted for almost 12.5 millions in comparison with least preference given to car by only 4.5 millions of students in 1990. The other categories cycling, walking with bus and bus was selected by 6.2, 5.9 and 6.5 millions of students respectively.

On the other hand, the reverse has been observed in the case of car passenger, they peaked at 10.5 millions in 2010 in contrast to last in 1990. The figures for all the other categories plummeted drammatically up to 6, 2, 3 and 4.5 for walking, cycling, walking with bus and bus respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
... for almost 12.5 millions in comparison with least preference given to car by only 4.5 mil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...least preference given to car by only 4.5 millions of students in 1990. The other categories ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
... and bus was selected by 6.2, 5.9 and 6.5 millions of students respectively. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93373493976 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73818209166 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524096385542 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.1700165812 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156699109968 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878762814881 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881471786272 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120248245989 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851196674971 0.0819641961636 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.