The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002
The bar chart compares the data about incidents and injuries per 100 million PMT caused by five means of transportation in 2002.
It is evident from the chart given that overall while the number of injuries seemed to be smaller than that of incidents, the figures for demand response were considerably higher than others. Furthermore, the biggest gap between incidents and injuries was also seen in demand response.
The number of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled by commuter rail were only 20 and 17, respectively, which were by far the smallest numbers, compared to other means. The figures for heavy rail were much higher (51 incidents and 35 injuries per 100 million PMT). Demand response, on the other hand, witnessed the significantly highest number of injuries (173) and incidents (225) in the year surveyed.
Light rail and bus, in contrast, experienced the same figures for incidents, which was 76 per 100 million PMT, wheareas the number of injuries caused by bus was much higher than that of light rail (66 vs. 39 per 100 million PMT)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'significantly the highest'.
Suggestion: significantly the highest
...ponse, on the other hand, witnessed the significantly highest number of injuries 173 and incidents 22...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99444444444 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62684973041 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7918733755 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419451262516 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207464017975 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110252448951 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267032619803 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109241394848 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.