The chart below shows the percentage of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target (what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve), and the number of complaints from passengers.
The first bar chart below illustrates the proportion of a bus company in relation to its actual and intended punctuality, whereas the second chart provides information about how many complaints they received per thousand passengers journeys.
Overall, it is evident that the actual punctuality witnessed a minor fluctuation during the time frame. In terms of commuter complaints, the bus company experienced a general upward trend over the period of five years.
In 1999, the company’s punctuality hit its highest point at precisely 85%, close to the goal of 86%, after which it saw a considerable decline to 82% in 2000, falling short of the 86% performance benchmark. Subsequently, the features in 2001 and 2002 mirrored the similarly modest fluctuation, increasing to 84.5% and 84.1%, respectively, both close to the respective annual targets of 85%. By 2003, the actual punctuality was 85%, exceeding the expected level by approximately 0.5%.
Regarding the number of complaints, it started at 70 per thousand passenger journeys in 1999 and then increased to 100 per thousand after one year. In 2001, the number saw a slight reduction to about 90, after which it rose to 110 in 2002 before ending the period and peaking at 120 in 2003.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, similarly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16336633663 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97630168637 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628712871287 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4227617096 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228160052407 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903770796106 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589567875374 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131541002754 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060830215755 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.