The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart gives some information about the proportion of British and Welsh families, which are living in owned and rented houses from 1918 to 2011. As an overall trend, the number of rented households decreased considerably whereas the number of owned houses increased substantially throughout the given period.
According to the bar chart, the ratio of families, which lived in their own accomodation doubled from about 23% in 1918 to 40% in 1961. After this, the percentage of owned houses became equal to the percentage of rented houses and both reached almost 50% in 1971.Over the next years, there was a gradual growth of numbers of self-owned houses with slight fluctations and peaked at about 73% in 2001. In contrast, the proportion of rental households declined hugely from its maximum level of 70% in 1918 to the minimum level of nearly 30% in 2001, but afterwards there was a minimal climb of approximately 38% in 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart gives some information abo...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ouseholds decreased considerably whereas the number of owned houses increased sub...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tantially throughout the given period. According to the bar chart, the ratio of...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lived in their own accomodation doubled from about 23% in 1918 to 40% in 1961. A...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Over
...ses and both reached almost 50% in 1971.Over the next years, there was a gradual gro...
^^^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s declined hugely from its maximum level of 70% in 1918 to the minimum level of n...
^^
Line 2, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere was a minimal climb of approximately 38% in 2011.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96178343949 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70125278401 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3818530663 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.8 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176177375054 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980620239318 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391373372812 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151725828017 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186743668337 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.