The bar chart provide information about percentage of purchased and leased accommodation in both England and Wales during 1918 to 2011. Overall, it can be seen that the owned and rented accommodations showed an opposite trend. At the beginning of the period, the percentage of leased accommodations outraced the purchased housings, but it did not stay until the end of the period since 1971.
In 1918, the percentage of families in rented accommodation stood at approximately 78% which was about four times of families in leased accommodation's percentage. The next year, in 1939, the leased housings decreased to about 68% where the owned accommodations increased to about 32%. In 1953, both purchased and leased housings had the same percentage with the previous year. However, owned accommodation continued to increase to around 40% where leased accommodation continued its decrease to near 60%, before both stood at the same percentages in 50% in 1971.
After 1971, changes happened where the percentages of families in purchased accommodation started to increase to around 69%, from 1981 to 2001, before experienced a slight decrease in 2011 to around 63%. In contrary, from the period of 1981 to 2001, households in rented housings began to decrease to about 31%, before rose to around 35% in 2011.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25714285714 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0344058805 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8540665629 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234771675013 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112712756164 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676184682575 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169760936324 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603243258866 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.