The chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000
The two pie charts depict how eight different industrial sectors contributed to the Indian and Turkeys economy percentage-wise for the year 2000.
Overall, the agriculture sector had a maximum contribution in India and the lowest sector was construction. While in Turkey health care and education sectors were the largest contributors, whereas the least was mad by finance, business and other services.
Firstly, in India, the majority of contributions noticed in agriculture(24%), where half of it shares had the government sector. The manufacturing sector alone contributes a total of construction( 3%) and finance (5%).
Moreover, the leisure and hospitality and health sectors contribute the equal proportion of share with 17%gor each, which was 3% more than the trade sector.
Secondly, the least amount of contribution seen in finance, business and other sectors at 8 % in Turkey. Almost double of it accounted for healthcare and education and trade utilities and transportation. similarly, government and construction services had almost 10%. Interestingly, the equal percentage noticed in agriculture and leisure and hospitality with 14% for each, in which only 2% of difference had the manufacturing service(12%).
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participant
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...and trade utilities and transportation. similarly, government and construction services h...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72527472527 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.351228503 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5098446628 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333307453885 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128582153659 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113578717976 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198103298239 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110927473702 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.