The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the proportion of individuals' drinking habits among coffee and tea from five Australian cities.
It is noticable that in both five cities, the percentage of citizens who prefered buying instant coffee in last four weeks stayed the lowest rate, and most of people went to cafeteria bought coffee or tea except Adelaide.
Most people lived in Melbourne didn't have a specific preference of coffee or tea, with 63% people who bought both coffee and tea in the past month. Sydney and Hobart had resemble figures with 61% and 62% perspectivly. In Brisbane, only 34% individuals would buy fresh coffee while the proportion of buying instant coffee reached 52%.
There was only one city that more people liked to buy instant coffee rather than making a choice from coffee and tea, the percentage of buying instant coffee was 50%, higher than people who liked both coffee and tea by 1%. However, Adelaide was not the city with the highest proportion of drinking instant coffee, 54% of Hobart residences loved instant coffee and Brisbane citizens followed them with 52%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...buying instant coffee in last four weeks stayed the lowest rate, and most of peop...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...four weeks stayed the lowest rate, and most of people went to cafeteria bought coffee or tea ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...aide. Most people lived in Melbourne didnt have a specific preference of coffee or...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
...n the past month. Sydney and Hobart had resemble figures with 61% and 62% perspectivly. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
...n the past month. Sydney and Hobart had resemble figures with 61% and 62% perspectivly. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03867403315 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35855311773 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6146492318 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244815090377 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124914860868 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733561198557 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173326350772 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396188209009 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.