The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar graph shows the total number of telephone calls in UK. From the graph it is evident that the use of Local-fixed line has been dominant over the years. With about 70 billion minutes of call in 1995, it increased in a steady manner, that peaked in the year 1999, after which it started to decrease. Finally in 2002 the use of them became about the same as 1995.
Then there are national and international-fixed line. In 1995 the amount of its’ usage was about half that of the local phone calls. Over time, the graph shows a gradual increase in its usage. In 2002, roughly 60 billion minutes of national and international phone calls were made.
After the two major types of calls comes the use of mobiles. In 1995, a negligible time was spent in UK using mobiles. Only about 4 billion minutes of calls were made in mobiles, which is not even close as compared to the other types of calls. Although the use of mobiles increased in a gradual fashion, its’ significant rise started roughly in the time from 1999 to 2000. After that till 2002, the amount of mobile calls have secured a significant portion in the statistics of the telephone calls in UK, which is about 50 billion minutes.
So to conclude, the graph shows gradual increase and decrease of local phone calls, accompanied by the increase in the amount of national and international calls. Also there is a dramatic increase in the use of mobiles in the time near 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a steady manner" with adverb for "steady"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n minutes of call in 1995, it increased in a steady manner, that peaked in the year 1999, after wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...99, after which it started to decrease. Finally in 2002 the use of them became about th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...international phone calls were made. After the two major types of calls comes the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a gradual fashion" with adverb for "gradual"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... Although the use of mobiles increased in a gradual fashion, its' significant rise started rou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nt of national and international calls. Also there is a dramatic increase in the use...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63565891473 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53384043201 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472868217054 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9047840531 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7333333333 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250277538216 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954659150738 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893016467756 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162074890379 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879301619629 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.