The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephonic calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The chart explains the information about the categories of telephonic calls made by UK people over 8 years between 1995 and 2002 in terms of Minutes.
Overall, it is clear that calls related to the National and international category and the calls made by the people in all the cities through mobiles had experienced an upward trend throughout the entire period, whereas the local line category had followed a moderate downward trend in the entire period.
In detail, the number of minutes spent on mobile phones in the United Kingdom increased from 2 billion to almost 40 billion from 1995 to 2002. Similarly, pupils who made calls to International and National countries by telephone had contributed close to 40 billion minutes during the year 1995, then there was a gradual increase in the usage of international calls to about 50 billion minutes in the year 1999. Moreover, they reached a value of around 60 billion minutes in the next seven years.
In contrast, the communication type named locals (fixed lines) used by the Europe people during the beginning of the period was about 71 billion minutes. Although there was a moderate hike seen during the mid-period nearly to a value of about 90 billion minutes, but the same category dropped to the original count which was 71 billion minutes at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lines'' or 'line's'?
Suggestion: lines'; line's
...ut the entire period, whereas the local lines category had followed a moderate downwa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, similarly, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91517857143 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60211951849 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540178571429 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8507523429 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.285714286 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289309947144 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143506295981 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904285600773 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176699240492 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979370935649 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.