The given bar graph illustrates total number of minutes (in billions) of different call types in the UK. Overall, it can be observed that calls from mobile phones has significantly increased over the years.
Telephone calls done locally from fixed line were the highest in all years compared to the other two category. Local calls by telephone had an increasing trend and was peaked for two years just before its usage started declining. Around 90 billion minutes of calls were made locally by telephone in the year 1998 and 1999 which was the highest minutes ever communicated by any category. National and international calls made by fixed line saw a gradual rise in minutes by just 5 billions minutes each year and was same in 2001 and 2002 at around 60 billion minutes.On the other hand, mobiles were least used in 1995 at hardly 5 billions minutes used for local or national or international calls. However, usage of mobiles dramatically increased over the years and around 45 billion minutes were communicated in 2002.
To sum up, calls made locally by telephone were the highest and that made nationally or internationally and by mobile phone saw a surge in the trend over the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
... in all years compared to the other two category. Local calls by telephone had an increa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...1 and 2002 at around 60 billion minutes.On the other hand, mobiles were least used...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88669950739 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66362656025 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.585094062 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182533237529 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964783401441 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500954081589 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126968636288 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587394799774 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.