The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

The given bar graph gives information about the spoken minutes in united kingdom for three types of local, national and international phone calls as well as mobile calling.
In general, the initial impression from figure, we can say that the local calls for fixed line had fluctuated during given period, while the national and international calls for fixed line increased gradually between 1995 and 2002. In addition, mobile calls also rose up significantly during the same period.
The local calls for fixed line were around doubled the local and international calls in 1995, it is just 74 million minutes. However, the number of minutes for local and international close to the number of minutes for local calls in 2001 and 2002, it is just 60 million minutes.
For national and international calls, the number of minutes increased from 37 million in 1995 to 62 million in 2002, which still below local calls.
For mobile calls, it witness a important growth from just 4 million minutes in 1995 to 45 million minutes in 2002 which is less than national and international calls by approximately 17 million minutes, from that people in Britain tend toward mobile more than traditional communication devices

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'witnesses'?
Suggestion: witnesses
...elow local calls. For mobile calls, it witness a important growth from just 4 million ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...al calls. For mobile calls, it witness a important growth from just 4 million mi...
^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e than traditional communication devices
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, well, while, in addition, in general, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11055276382 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71557714554 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0994921096 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.285714286 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2081740631 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117219132783 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046248686674 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134374808475 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327190232944 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.