The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk devided into three categories, from 1995 -2002. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent.
The bar graph illustrates the total figure of minutes by phone calls from 1995 to 2002 in UK, separate into three categories.
Overall, the amount of time of the local phone calls had not changed even though there were some flexibles. Meanwhile, the number of telephone calls of others rose significantly.
In 1995, the amount of local calls type was highest at more than 70 billion minutes, while the national and international phone calls was half lower. Whereas, the mobile calls had the lowest number at approximately 3 billion minutes. In 1999, the local phone calls slightly increased and reached the highest peak at 90 billion, while the other two numbers also gradually went up.
In 2002, the national and international calls experienced a significant rise to 60 billion minutes, while mobile calls grew dramatically to 45 billion. However, it still stood at the lowest point to compare to others while the local calls dropped to the same amount in 1995 but was still at the highest number.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ternational phone calls was half lower. Whereas, the mobile calls had the lowest number...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the same amount in 1995 but was still at the highest number.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97619047619 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63350985372 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.436195301 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216511587083 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1155736354 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846025982521 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164490913435 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929186052537 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.