The chart below shows the value of one country‘s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016. the table shows the percentage change in each category of experts i 2016 compared with 2015.
The chart and table illustrate the amount of exported goods in a country which is about five different items and they are compared in two years, 2015 and 2016. The quantity of numbers in chart is based on billion dollar.
Overall, it is clear that engineered goods and petroleum products had exported more than the other goods in 2015 and 2016 which had slight grow in 2016 and reached to almost 62 billion dollar in both fields.
While exporting most of the goods had upward trend in table and chart, the gems and jewellery group had down ward trend with 5.18 percent decline which from around 42 billion $ in 2016, it decreased to approximately 41 billion. Petroleum products have slight increase about 3 percent from nearly 61 billion reached to 63 billion. Second goods in chart is engineered goods which with 8.5 percent could improve the quantity of expert from around 57 to 61 billion $. Agricultural products had not major changes in the quantity, however it had small rise around 0.81 percent and 31 billion. Despite trivial increase in agricultural product, textiles had noticeable improve with 15.24 percent and it could export from 25 to around 31 billion dollar.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... exporting most of the goods had upward trend in table and chart, the gems and jewel...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods had upward trend in table and chart, the gems and jewellery group had down wa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90954773869 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42181777936 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1136906807 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15217297348 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798948647507 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721630410765 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142818809625 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598152622468 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.