The chart below shows the value of one country's export in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.
The chart illustrates the value of exports ($ billions) of a country in 5 different categories (Petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewelry, agricultural products and textiles) and the table below depicts the percentage change in each category in 2015 and 2016.
In 2015, the value of export of petroleum products was highest with a value of $61 billion and least value was identified for textiles ($25 billion). The export value for engineered goods was slightly less than that of petroleum products ($57 billion) and the value of agriculture goods was greater than that of textiles by $6 billion. Gems and Jewelry produced an export value of $42 billion.
In 2016, again export value of petroleum product topped in the table with a value of $62 billion. Value of Textile export and agricultural products was same this year ($32 billion) and the export of gems and jewelry was greater than these two by $9 billion. A difference of $1 billion was figured in the diagram between petroleum products and engineering goods.
Finally, from the chart and the table we can conclude that the value of export in all the categories except for gems and jewelry was increased in 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods was greater than that of textiles by billion. Gems and Jewelry produced an ex...
^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd jewelry was greater than these two by billion. A difference of billion was fi...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n these two by billion. A difference of billion was figured in the diagram betwe...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...troleum products and engineering goods. Finally, from the chart and the table we...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66931832276 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415384615385 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1008267414 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250649390458 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154059837783 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112657606228 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215531554362 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102792751199 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.