The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

The bar chart and the table illustrated the export earnings of petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewelry, agricultural products and textiles, and each of the increasing and decreasing rates over the two years from 2015 to 2016.

To begin with, there were upward trends in the four products except for gems and jewelry in this period. Looking at the percentage change in value, the rate of textiles showed a significant rise by 15.24%, which reached over $30 billion, followed by engineered goods and petroleum products by 8.5% and by 3%, respectively, either of which earned over $60 billion. Agricultural products stayed about the same, but there was a slight increase of 0.81%, which received almost $30 billion.

On the other hand, although gems and jewelry were the third-largest export earnings in the five categories at almost $40 billion both in 2015 and in 2016, they were the only one category that saw downward trends. Their export earnings declined by 5.18% between 2015 and 2016.

In conclusion, the increasing trends in five categorized/classified items except for gems and jewelry were shown, and the total export earnings of them reached over $220 billion in 2016.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, third, except for, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19072164948 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88676361822 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9618740658 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.857142857 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238145372524 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114058121463 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866487608972 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15011840874 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889414543718 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.