The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given bar graph illustrates about the quantity of one nation exports in many categories between 2015 and 2016. And the given table chart shows the changes in all categories of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
After analysing it is clear that, the maximum value in bar graph was petroleum products as compared to others. And the textiles had more change in the table chart.
To begin with, the export earning from 2015 to 2016. In 2015, the petroleum products were earn 60 billion and it increased to 63 billion in 2016. Moreover, engineered goods were earn 57 billon in 2015 and it also go upto 61 billion in 2016. Whereas, gems and jewellery were increased in 2015 (42 billion) and after one year this was decreased slightly (40 billion ). And the agricultural products were constant between 2015 and 2016. But textiles were increased in 2016, it were 39 billion.
Furthermore, the petroleum products were increased 3% in 2015 and 2016. And engineered goods were also increased their value 8.5% but the gems and jewellery value was decreased 5.18%. The maximum value was increased in textiles (15.24%). And the agricultural products were also little increased 0.81%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...6. In 2015, the petroleum products were earn 60 billion and it increased to 63 billi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...n 2016. Moreover, engineered goods were earn 57 billon in 2015 and it also go upto 6...
^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'billon' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'billons'.
Suggestion: billons
...Moreover, engineered goods were earn 57 billon in 2015 and it also go upto 61 billion ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r this was decreased slightly 40 billion . And the agricultural products were cons...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, so, well, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94923857868 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51136077974 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46192893401 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2292549657 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.6428571429 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0714285714 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334140697469 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151057583326 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156552344259 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234519274268 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183587881182 0.0819641961636 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.