Some people think the government should not spend on international aid because there are disadvantaged people in their country, such as the unemployed and homeless. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, masses suffer from a lot of deasilgases and many believe that authority should invest money in international aid but handful to individuals think that government should spend on their unemployed or homeless people rather than international aid. I partially agree with this statement and are discussed both the views in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, the law makers should spend money on international aid and it is good for every individual. If any authority spend money on international aid this becomes more beneficial for their nation because this helps to face situation in numerous problems. For instance, corona pendemic is spread in the whole world during past decade. And the United States of America found the vaccine of that disease because this nation invest more funds in international aid. And due to this, America had less rate of mortality in the pendemic of COVID-19.
On the flip side, some individuals think spend to money on international aid become numerous drawbacks. Therefore, authority should spend money on unemployed and homeless masses. Whereas, a lot of students are degree holders however, they are unemployed because government do not spend money in business or another fields. Moreover, many people faces poverty, as they do not arrange their daily food and they are homeless. Law makers should constructed house for homeless masses because this is necessary for human beings.
To conclude, although, there are lot of benefits to spend on international aid however, firstly authorities should spend money on their nation rather than international aid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d spend money on unemployed and homeless masses. Whereas, a lot of students are d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84057482137 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513833992095 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7700359154 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.384615385 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373199537738 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13460286353 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937951652358 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257481364122 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833742310004 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.