Some people think the government should not spend on international aid because there are disadvantaged people in their country, such as the unemployed and homeless. Do you agree or disagree?
According to the statement, some of the individuals consider that legal authorities should not provide funds for global aid. Because there are number of masses which are unemployed and shelterless in their nation. I completely agree with this cause and reasons are discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, in contemporary settings, some of the nations face poverty due to numerous reasons such as poor infrastructure, organization, undeveloped and so on. Therefore, other prosperous nations spend funds on global aiding however, they should not done this. The first and foremost reason is that there are numerous individuals in their nation which faces unemployment. Therefore, these nations should provide more focus in that cause because employment is the major bit of progression for a nation and its economy. For instance,in present duration, most of the individuals are graduates or postgraduates. Despite of that, they face unemployment with pieces of their diplomas. Hence, legal authorities should improve their business and industrial sectors in which they should reserve places for young generation or unemployed masses to provide them employment and their handsome salaries. As a result, this also represents positive aspect on the economic progression of the nation.
Furthermore, the another factor of this notion is poverty and homeless situations which are maximumly faced by roadsiders or beggars. In this criteria, most of the people are shelterless and suffering from poverty in which they beg to fulfill their necessities such as food. For instance, in India, there is higher proportion of residents which are lived in slum areas or on roadsides. These residents and their pupils are suffering from malnutrition and unhygienic conditions which leads to incline in the mortality rate. Apart from that, there is also no education and health services which are not provided to them. Due to which, this leads to decline in their literacy rate and economy to. Therefore, the committes of the nation should provide shelter, education, health and other essential services to their citizens rather than to spend on international aid.
To recapitulate, I personally consider that legal authorities should spend more on the economy and progression of their own nation such as superior facilities, provide employment and so on in comparison to spend maximum on global aid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
According to the statement, some of the individuals consider that legal authori...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o begin with, in contemporary settings, some of the nations face poverty due to numerous re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...r a nation and its economy. For instance,in present duration, most of the individua...
^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...umly faced by roadsiders or beggars. In this criteria, most of the people are shelte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45161290323 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96459920087 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478494623656 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5696659325 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.736842105 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202263296083 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635577160597 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500078178413 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139785697093 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145730978949 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.